I had hoped to be able to write about the new printed circuit boards this weekend, and maybe even show one built up, but they didn’t arrive. I had guessed that it would take them 9 days to get to Ohio from Oregon, which would have made them arrive yesterday. There have been several snowstorms in areas they would be passing through, so it’s quite possible they were delayed by weather.
I’m still working on getting the Actel Microsemi development environment set up at home. When I tried to register for a free license key, the web site was down for maintenance. I’m looking forward to getting it installed and starting work on some Verilog code. First up will be an iambic keyer.
The goals for this layout constrained it to be a nearly single-sided layout, with a ground plane on the back. That way, the board could be mounted directly on a piece of copperclad with no short circuits to ground. My budget limited me to a double-sided board, so all signal and power traces had to go on the top side.
To get to my goal of a DSP-based ham radio using an FPGA as the DSP, I first need a way to prototype with an FPGA. Available FPGAs all use modern, small packages such as QFNs, QFPs, and BGAs. I can’t imagine soldering wires directly to a hundred tiny pins, so “dead-bug” construction, with the chip upside-down on a piece of copperclad board, is out. I need a breakout PCB that holds the chip and brings out its pins to something more reasonable to work with.
I’ve been thinking for some time about a DSP-based ham radio. After
considering and discarding more grandiose schemes, I was inspired by my
Norcal 40A. It and the original Norcal 40 are fairly simple and highly
reproducible (thousands were built). However, performance was not
sacrificed in the name of simplicity. Instead, the rig was carefully
designed to make the most of its NE602 mixers and crystal filter.
Why not try for the same goals in a DSP-based rig? In theory, one should
be able to subsume all of the IF and most of the RF and baseband into the
DSP, leaving little but filtering components and a few amplifiers outboard.
The result would have a small number of components and would be fairly easy
I set a goal to build a self-contained radio, not a PC-based software defined radio. It will be narrow band for simplicity. As much functionality as practical will be done digitally. Finally, the design should be reproducible by others. That, in turn, means that it should be documented, it should use a low-cost DSP toolchain, and it should be insensitive to component variation.
Finally, I have an interest in delta-sigma techniques and multirate DSP, and the radio will be an excellent platform to explore and experiment with those technologies.